Urgent alert for Australian companies and foreign entities: ASIC has eliminated discretionary grace periods. The automated penalty system now operates without exception.
ASIC has fully automated its late fee penalty system for the 2026 financial year. The informal grace period that previously existed for companies that missed deadlines due to administrative errors, address changes, or communication gaps has been effectively eliminated. For directors and company officers who have grown accustomed to requesting fee waivers or extensions, this represents a fundamental change in ASIC's enforcement culture — and one that carries immediate financial consequences for any company that misses its annual compliance window.
This guide explains precisely what the ASIC Annual Review process involves, what the zero tolerance policy means in practice, the full schedule of late fees, the often-overlooked solvency resolution obligation, and what foreign companies registered in Australia need to know about their additional compliance requirements. Most importantly, it explains how to build a compliance process that ensures you never face an ASIC late fee again.
Every Australian company registered under the Corporations Act 2001 receives an Annual Company Statement from ASIC on the anniversary of its registration date. This statement is ASIC's way of ensuring that the information held on the public register — directors' names and addresses, registered office address, shareholder details, and company particulars — remains accurate and current.
The Annual Review triggers several simultaneous obligations for the company:
In previous years, ASIC operated a degree of administrative discretion regarding late fee waivers. Companies that received their Annual Statement at an outdated address, companies that had recently changed company secretaries, and companies that could demonstrate genuine administrative error sometimes succeeded in having late fees waived or reduced through an informal request process.
ASIC's 2026 policy change has two components. First, ASIC has automated the late fee levy system so that late fees are applied algorithmically at the moment a payment deadline passes — there is no human review before the fee is applied, and the system does not distinguish between administrative errors and deliberate non-compliance. Second, ASIC has confirmed that its discretion to waive late fees in response to informal requests will be exercised only in the most exceptional circumstances, and that the threshold for "exceptional" has been raised substantially.
The practical effect is that late fees applied after the 2026 policy change should be treated as unavoidable and irreversible once incurred. The only way to avoid them is to comply on time — not to seek a waiver after the fact.
For foreign companies operating in Australia and for Australian subsidiaries of overseas parents (including many Indian-owned subsidiaries), this change is particularly significant. These entities often have compliance management challenges due to time zone differences, unfamiliarity with Australian regulatory deadlines, and reliance on local agents who may not be proactively tracking review dates. The risk of inadvertent late payment has always been higher for these entities than for domestically-managed Australian businesses.
The late fee regime applies in addition to — not instead of — the standard annual review fee. Both the review fee and the late fee are payable when a payment is overdue.
| Payment Status | Late Fee (2026) | Total Additional Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Paid on time (within 2 months of review date) | Nil | Standard annual review fee only |
| Up to 1 month late (between 2 and 3 months after review date) | $96 | Review fee + $96 |
| More than 1 month late (more than 3 months after review date) | $401 | Review fee + $401 |
For a small proprietary company with a standard annual review fee of $310, missing the payment deadline by more than one month results in a total annual compliance bill of $711 — more than double the standard fee. For companies with multiple directors, registered foreign companies, or companies with more complex structures, the base annual review fee is higher, making the proportional cost of lateness even more significant.
These fees are not a one-time consequence of lateness — they apply every year. A company that is consistently late with its annual review payment will accumulate $401 in late fees every year on top of its standard fee, potentially over thousands of dollars in unnecessary expenditure across a five- or ten-year period.
Of all the obligations triggered by the ASIC Annual Review, the solvency resolution is the one that most commonly catches companies unaware — including companies that have dutifully paid their annual review fee on time.
Under Section 347A of the Corporations Act 2001, the directors of an Australian company must pass a solvency resolution within two months of each annual review date. A solvency resolution is a formal resolution of the board of directors declaring that, in the directors' opinion, the company is solvent — meaning it is able to pay its debts as and when they fall due and payable.
The solvency resolution must be:
If the directors cannot form a positive solvency opinion — that is, if they believe the company may not be able to pay its debts — they must pass a negative solvency resolution and lodge it with ASIC using Form 485. Filing a negative solvency resolution triggers ASIC's supervision of the company's financial position and may lead to further inquiry. This is a separate and more serious compliance event than simply missing the deadline for a positive resolution.
The consequence of failing to pass a solvency resolution (positive or negative) within two months of the review date is that the company is in breach of Section 347A, regardless of whether the annual fee has been paid. The breach is a strict liability offence — it does not matter whether the directors were aware of the obligation or intended to comply. Every director of the company at the time of the breach is potentially personally liable for the breach, and ASIC can issue infringement notices and impose civil penalties.
For companies with Indian resident directors who may not be closely involved in day-to-day Australian compliance, the solvency resolution obligation is a particular risk. If your Australian subsidiary's Indian directors have not been passing formal annual solvency resolutions, your company may have been in ongoing breach of Section 347A for years.
A "registered foreign company" — an overseas company registered to carry on business in Australia under Part 5B.2 of the Corporations Act — has all the same annual review obligations as an Australian domestic company, plus additional obligations specific to its foreign company status.
Foreign companies registered in Australia must:
The annual review fee for registered foreign companies is higher than for domestic companies. For the 2025–2026 financial year, the review fee for a foreign company is $546. The late fee schedule is the same — $96 for up to one month late, $401 for more than one month late.
ASIC's review date is fixed as the anniversary of your company's registration date. This means every company has a unique review date, and the two-month payment window and two-month solvency resolution window both start from that specific date — not from a common financial year calendar.
Many companies confuse their ASIC review date with standard financial year deadlines (30 June or 31 December). This is a significant compliance risk. Your ASIC review date may fall in September, March, or any other month of the year depending on when your company was registered. If you do not know your company's ASIC review date, log in to the ASIC company register and look up your company — the annual review date is visible in the company's registered details.
Build the following dates into your compliance calendar immediately after confirming your review date:
Scenario 1 — Missed email notification: ASIC sends the Annual Company Statement to the email address registered for the company's ASIC account. If the company secretary has left, the email address has changed, or the statement goes to a junk folder, the company may miss the review entirely. Result: Annual fee + $401 late fee + potential solvency resolution breach. Prevention: maintain a dedicated, monitored compliance email address with ASIC and review it regularly.
Scenario 2 — Fee paid, resolution forgotten: The director pays the annual review fee promptly but forgets to pass the solvency resolution. Result: Annual review fee paid on time, no late fee — but the company is in breach of Section 347A. ASIC compliance audit or third-party due diligence (such as a potential investor or bank conducting company searches) may uncover the breach. Prevention: treat the solvency resolution as an item on the payment checklist — both must be completed on the same day.
Scenario 3 — Indian director not informed: An Australian subsidiary's Indian resident director is not aware of the annual review date or solvency resolution obligation. The Australian team assumes the Indian director is handling it; the Indian director assumes the Australian team is handling it. Result: breach of both obligations. Prevention: appoint a professional registered agent who takes ownership of both obligations.
Scenario 4 — Overseas address change not updated: The company's registered office address changes but the update is not lodged with ASIC within 28 days. ASIC's Annual Company Statement is sent to the old address. The company is unaware until the late fee is applied. Result: Annual fee + late fee + Form 484 late lodgement fee for the address change. Prevention: update ASIC immediately upon any address change, before the change takes effect.
A professional registered agent service — provided by a corporate services firm such as CorpArray — eliminates the risk of ASIC late fees through systematic deadline management. Rather than relying on the company's own directors to track a review date that may fall on any day of the year, a registered agent service takes over the following responsibilities:
For Indian-owned Australian subsidiaries and registered foreign companies — where the directors are often based in India and have limited bandwidth for Australian administrative matters — a professional registered agent service is not merely convenient but effectively essential for maintaining good standing with ASIC.
ASIC late fees are a financial nuisance, but their larger importance lies in what they signal about a company's compliance posture. A company with a history of late ASIC filings will face greater scrutiny during:
Conversely, an unblemished ASIC compliance record is a low-cost but high-value indicator of a well-governed business. It signals to every party that conducts a company search that your business takes its obligations seriously — and that signal has tangible commercial value.
CorpArray's Registered Agent service covers your Annual Review obligations, solvency resolution preparation, and all ASIC correspondence management. For a predictable annual fee, we handle everything — so your directors never have to think about it. Particularly recommended for Indian-owned Australian companies and registered foreign companies.
Switch to CorpArray Registered AgentThe most common mistakes companies make with their Annual Review and how to avoid them.
Read MoreWhat Indian directors of Australian companies must do to comply with the 2026 enforcement action.
Read MoreHow to register your overseas business in Australia and what ongoing compliance looks like.
Read More